Once  upon a time the world – or at least the  Free World - was led  by Reagan, Thatcher and Mitterand. Leaders with presence, standing and most  important of all, respect. They were even respected by opponents. 
![]()  | 
| British Prime Minister Thatcher, US President Reagan, French President Mitterrand and  West German Chancellor Schmidt at an international summit meeting (L to R)  | 
During  those times the US and its likeminded 'friends,' e.g. Britain and France, ran  the world using a combination of bribery and force. They lorded over other  lesser nations through a series of interlocking multilateral security  arrangements and an economic institutional framework comprising of entities  like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.  
In  a nutshell, that was the post World War Two world order. 
But  those were different times. The developed world had money and delivered on promises.  Other countries believed them. 
The  US, as the undisputed leader of the 'Free World,' provided a security blanket for  its satellite states. In return for ceding a part of their national sovereignty  to the US, the US provided clear leadership, especially in times of crisis.  
That  was the 1980s. Much has changed in the ensuing four decades.
The  Berlin Wall - the symbolic Iron Curtain dividing the world's two Superpowers (the  US and the Soviet Union) - came down in 1991. That same year the Union of  Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) morphed – nay collapsed – and became the  Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). (The CIS structure was a graceful way  for the USSR to exit the Russian Empire's historic obligations and focus on saving  Russia itself.)
Socialism  all but died with the Soviet Union. Today all countries engage in private  enterprise and global trade. Meanwhile Socialism has been discredited though significant  parts of socialist philosophy have made their way into mainstream thought, e.g.  public healthcare and social safety nets. 
![]()  | 
| China's Belt and Road Initiative reflects China's aspirations as a global trading power | 
As  for the global economy, the US is no longer the undisputed master. To be sure,  the US Dollar remains king but its throne is a little shaky.
In  the past it was said, "If the US sneezes then the world catches a cold." Today,  if the US sneezes, the rest of the world simply says, "Bless You" and moves on.  The risk of catching a cold is remote – at least not an intense life threatening  cold resulting in mass unemployment. 
In  2020 the communist party managed People's Republic of China (PRC) has the world's  largest economy. Based on data released by the IMF, World Bank and the CIA, China's economy is significantly  larger than its closest rival. Indeed,  China's gross domestic product (GDP) surpasses the GDP of the combined European  Union (EU) nations. 
The  deterioration in the US position has not been only in the economic domain. 
Extraordinary  leaders create and husband prestige. Prestige is an invisible halo which adds  to the 'je ne sais quoi' aura of  rulers. It is built up over decades but can be lost quickly. 
American prestige reached its peak during the first Iraq war with Operation Desert Storm in 1991 and Powell's 'Shock and Awe' tactics of overwhelming force. Since 1991 a series of events have diminished US global standing.
American prestige reached its peak during the first Iraq war with Operation Desert Storm in 1991 and Powell's 'Shock and Awe' tactics of overwhelming force. Since 1991 a series of events have diminished US global standing.
Militarily,  the downtrend started with the 1993 failed US intervention in  Somalia, Operation Restore Hope  and the casualties suffered in the Battle of Mogadishu. Then came the 9/11  attack, which taking place on US domestic soil was a watershed moment. The  subsequent War on Terror, especially the Iraq war and the present scramble to  exit Afghanistan, did little to help stem the dissipation of US prestige. 
Simultaneously  a succession of other minor events, though not as individually significant as the  9/11 attack, cumulatively resulted in tarnishing America's sheen. These include  the US federal government shutdown in  2018 – 2019 (35  days) and 1995 – 1996 (26 days) and the 2008  Global Financial Crisis. 
Despite  the signs of decay, many still placed the mantle of leadership squarely on the  US and its small coterie of European friends. However, with recent events  surrounding the  Covid-19 pandemic it has become increasingly clear the US and its 'friends'  no longer rule the roost. 
In  its management of the Covid-19 pandemic, the world has seen the US's dysfunctional  soul. While state governors are at loggerheads with the federal  government over steps to contain the crisis the  US Covid-19 death toll and infection numbers rise uncontrollably. As of April 2, 2020 US deaths attributed  to Covid-19 have surpassed China, the original epicentre of the virus. 
Through  an unending sea of social media content, the world has witnessed the complete  disarray in the US (and most of Western Europe) caused by the pandemic. Most  revealing are not the lack of resources available to these governments' in  tackling the virus but more so the lack of national leadership and policy implementation  through state bureaucracies. 
The  world is used to headlines decrying poor governance, weak infrastructure;  limited resources, etc. Such news headlines are common across large swathes of  the world. However, they are more normally reserved for parts of Africa or  developing Asia than for the US or Europe. 
The  Covid-19 pandemic has hastened post war global structural changes. The US and  Europe, though still powerful, are less relevant international players. 
Following a steady erosion of economic and military power the irreparable loss of reputational prestige due to the management of the Covid-19 pandemic, neither the US nor Europe are able to provide global leadership. For example, there will be no Group of Seven summit resulting in a Baker Plan or issuance of Brady Bonds to save the world's economy from the ravages of the Covid-19 catastrophe. It's every nation for herself.
Following a steady erosion of economic and military power the irreparable loss of reputational prestige due to the management of the Covid-19 pandemic, neither the US nor Europe are able to provide global leadership. For example, there will be no Group of Seven summit resulting in a Baker Plan or issuance of Brady Bonds to save the world's economy from the ravages of the Covid-19 catastrophe. It's every nation for herself.
Until  further notice, the world suffers a leadership vacuum. 
China  may vie to fill the position but it's not ready yet - perhaps in a few decades.  More likely, second tier regional powers like India, Russia and Turkey will  temporarily fill the void in their respective neighborhoods until a more stable  arrangement is reached.  
No  matter what the coming new world order looks like, one fact is clear: Trump,  Boris and Macron cannot fill the shoes of Reagan, Thatcher or Mitterrand. 
__________________
Imran is a Singapore based Tour Guide with a special interest in  arts and history. Imran has lived and worked in several countries during his  past career as an international banker. He enjoys traveling, especially by  train, as a way to feed his curiosity about the world and nurture his interest  in photography. He  is available on Instagram (@imranahmedsg); twitter (@grandmoofti) and can be  contacted at imran.ahmed.sg@gmail.com.


No comments:
Post a Comment