Foul play makes the news. Arrests make headlines. Arrests of senior civil servants should not only make headlines but generate heated debate amongst civil society. Especially when the civil servants are peripheral to the country's security establishment.
Thus, it disturbing that news about the arrests of the Director of the Central Narcotics Bureau and the Commissioner of the Civil Defence Force, allegedly for corruption, was withheld from Singaporeans for several weeks. According to the Singapore authorities the narcotics chief was arrested on December 19, 2011 while the civil defence chief was arrested on January 4, 2012.
Singaporeans only heard of the arrests when a Chinese language paper broke the news on January 24, 2012.Until the January 24th news report, the authorities made no mention of the matter.
Clearly, the arrests dent the government's image, particularly at a time of heightened public scrutiny of various other government policies. Nonetheless, the government's handling of the incident raises several questions.
Why the delay in revealing such significant news? Certainly, the delay could not be related to the recent parliamentary debate about the linkage between corruption and high pay for public officials? Or could the delay be part of an effort by the authorities to somehow make the news more palatable to the general public when it was finally revealed?
Additionally, the episode makes one wonder whether there is more 'government related' information which has been kept from 'ordinary' Singaporeans? If news about the arrests of the chiefs of two of the Republic's premier government agencies can be successfully concealed for weeks then conceivably there is more news where that came from; facts and figures which may in some way damage the reputation of Singapore's political elite.
Moreover, who within the government decides what news is worthy of Singaporeans' interest and what news is 'unimportant' and may be held back?
Arguably, the government's failure to voluntarily disclose the news about the arrests of senior civil servants betrays a general lack of trust of the electorate. It indicates a 'We, your leaders, know best what is good for you.' We are more qualified to make decisions on your behalf. Singaporeans: be happy, quiet and trust us.
Undoubtedly, Singapore's success as an independent nation is due to visionary leadership. However, without the support of the general population Singapore's Third World to First World journey will not have been possible. If the government wishes to retain the support of the voting public then it will be well advised to adopt a more transparent posture. One would have thought that the ruling party's near misses in the recent General and Presidential Elections underscored that point loud and clear.
Surely, Singapore's government did not invest massively in its population's education only to keep them ignorant of the news.
Surely, Singapore's government did not invest massively in its population's education only to keep them ignorant of the news.
__________________
Imran is a business and management consultant. Through his work at Deodar Advisors, Imran improves the profitability of small and medium sized businesses operating in Singapore and the region. He can be reached at imran@deodaradvisors.com.