Presidential elections are scheduled in  Singapore for September 2017. As most are aware Singapore's next President must  be ethnically Malay. The Parliament deemed it so through amendments  to the Presidential Elections Act passed in February 2017. The changes also  establish a mechanism for the state to determine the ethnic community to which  each candidate belongs, i.e. Ms. Yacob and all other candidates for next  month's elections must be certified 'Malay' before their candidacies are  accepted.
To the relief of many Singaporeans Madam  Halimah Yacob has decided to stand as a candidate for Singapore's next  president. As a 50 percent Malay woman – her father was Indian and mother was  Malay - it is likely Madam Yacob is 'sufficiently' Malay and will pass the  government's 'Malayness' test. Hence, she is expected to be accepted as a Malay  candidate. Indeed, it will be very inconvenient if she is deemed 'not  sufficiently' Malay?
![]()  | 
| Race and ethnicity are nebulous concepts and categorizing people into defined boxes can be an imprecise organizational tool | 
The appropriateness of ethnicity  criteria tests to evaluate an individual's race is one difficulty. However,  for many the real problem is not determining a candidate's race; rather it is the  idea that Singapore has seemingly sacrificed a long held belief in meritocracy  at the altar of political expediency.
For the last five decades the government  has preached the creed of meritocracy almost to the notion of fanaticism.  Meritocracy trumped all else, including race based politics. The desire to  maintain societal meritocracy was even a factor in Singapore's 1965 expulsion  from the Federation of Malaysia. 
Suddenly, however, meritocracy is no longer  sacrosanct. On the contrary, the country's Constitution was amended to promote  a 'race based' presidency.
To be sure, there are supporters of the  government's policy of a 'reserved' (affirmative action?) presidency. Nonetheless,  the policy does open the door for 'affirmative action' in other areas where  minorities are proportionately underrepresented. 
For example, anecdotal  evidence suggests Malays are proportionately underrepresented in Singapore's armed  forces. Does the government's new policy stance indicate the government may soon  start reserving places for Malay officers in the military? Does the government’s new policy stance indicate it may soon start
reserving places for Malay officers in the military? If so, which ethnic
community (ies) will have to sacrifice in the implementation of such a policy?
Undoubtedly, there are many questions without any clear answers.
![]()  | 
| Is it possible to distill each human's DNA into race and ethnicity categories without fuzziness? | 
The government's policy 'adjustments' to the  presidential election system calling for candidates based on race contradicts  the country's founding principle of meritocracy.  After 52 years of independence one would  expect authorities to encourage deeper integration by gradually and  incrementally dismantling the CMIO (Chinese, Malay, Indian and Others) system –  a colonial race based legacy – rather than strengthening an world-view filtered  by ethnicity.
Meritocracy or allowing the most qualified to  naturally filter upwards has served Singapore well since independence. One  hopes the concept of 'ethnic fairness' will not further permeate the Singapore  system through quotas and reserved seats but will cease exactly where it  started: at the presidency.
Imran is an  adventurer, blogger, consultant, guide, photographer, speaker, traveler and a  banker in his previous life. He is available on twitter (@grandmoofti);  instagram (@imranahmedsg) and can be contacted at imran.ahmed.sg@gmail.com.




